Comparing ChatGPT and Perplexity AI Response Styles
Description provided by the user:
This slide visually compares the response styles of ChatGPT and Perplexity AI to the same prompt: "Summarize the key points of topic X." The goal is to highlight the differences in their approaches, content structure, and overall tone. ChatGPT's response is presented as a brief, friendly overview with bullet points for key takeaways, emphasizing an approachable and narrative style. Perplexity's response, on the other hand, is shown as a concise, single-paragraph summary with source citations, focusing on efficiency and factual accuracy. The slide aims to showcase how different AI models cater to various needs and preferences, encouraging users to choose the style that best suits their specific use case.
First, point to the header and read the shared prompt: “Summarize the key points of topic X.” Emphasize that both cards answer the same prompt but in different styles.
Next, reveal the ChatGPT-style card. Describe the structure: a friendly opening sentence to set context, followed by a short, readable bullet list of key points. Note the approachable tone and slightly more narrative framing.
Then, reveal the Perplexity-style card. Highlight the concise single-paragraph answer focused on essentials. Mention the compact source badges and how they foreground citations without clutter.
Finally, call out the design intent: same prompt, different response shapes—narrative plus bullets versus concise summary plus sources. Invite the audience to consider which style fits their use case.
Behind the Scenes
How AI generated this slide
Analyze the prompt and identify the core elements: comparing ChatGPT and Perplexity responses to a summarization prompt.
Determine the visual layout: a split-screen design to directly juxtapose the two responses.
Choose UI elements: cards with distinct color schemes (indigo for ChatGPT, emerald for Perplexity) to visually differentiate the two AI models.
Craft the content for each response, reflecting the typical style of each AI—ChatGPT as more conversational and Perplexity as more concise and fact-focused with sources.
Add animations using Framer Motion to create a dynamic presentation and guide the viewer's attention.
Incorporate speaker notes to provide context and guide the presentation flow, highlighting the key differences and encouraging audience engagement.
Why this slide works
This slide effectively communicates the differences between ChatGPT and Perplexity response styles through a clear visual comparison. The use of distinct visual cues, like color-coded cards and varied content structures, enhances understanding. Animations add a polished touch and improve engagement, while comprehensive speaker notes guide the presenter in highlighting the nuances of each AI's approach. The slide also encourages audience participation by prompting them to consider which style best suits their needs. The design leverages best practices for presentations, including clear visuals, concise text, and a focus on key takeaways, making it a strong example of effective AI-generated content for presentations, product comparisons, and technology demonstrations.
Slide Code
You need to be logged in to view the slide code.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the primary purpose of this slide?
The slide aims to visually demonstrate the different response styles of ChatGPT and Perplexity AI to the same prompt, highlighting their contrasting approaches to summarizing information. This allows viewers to quickly grasp the strengths of each model and choose the one that best fits their needs for conciseness, detail, and overall tone.
How does the slide's design contribute to its effectiveness?
The split-screen design, coupled with distinct color schemes for each AI, facilitates direct visual comparison. Animations add a dynamic element, drawing attention to specific features and making the presentation more engaging. Clear and concise text within each card ensures that the information is easily digestible, further enhancing understanding and comparison.
What are the key takeaways regarding the two AI models?
ChatGPT excels in providing a more conversational and approachable summary with bulleted key points, suitable for a narrative or explanatory context. Perplexity, conversely, shines in delivering concise, fact-focused summaries with source citations, making it ideal for situations requiring brevity and factual accuracy. The choice between the two depends on the specific use case and desired level of detail.
Create a slide comparing two distinct user experience (UX) workflows for question-answering: a chat-centric approach and a search-blend approach. The chat-centric workflow should prioritize a conversational flow, with tools available as secondary aids. The user interacts primarily through a chat interface, using commands like "continue," "refine," and "analyze." The search-blend workflow should emphasize a search-first approach. Users input queries, the system displays results as source cards with credibility ratings, and an assistant synthesizes the information. Users can then "follow up," "open sources," or "refine." Visually represent both workflows and highlight the typical user actions in each.
The slide explains the various product formats offered, including keyrings, 8cm vinyl figures, and mega editions, catering to different budgets and display preferences. It details the blind box model where the character inside is concealed, adding an element of surprise and maintaining consistent shelf visuals. The inclusion of rare "secret" figures within the blind boxes is highlighted as a key driver of hype, encouraging trading, repeat purchases, and social media buzz. The slide emphasizes how these formats establish a tiered value system, and the combination of blind boxes and secret figures generates sustained excitement and engagement among consumers.
Create a slide visualizing the growth and key milestones of a figurine brand from its inception to its current status. The slide should showcase a timeline format, highlighting significant events like collaborations, viral moments, and expansion into other media like anime. The timeline should span from the brand's first figurines to its current success, including a record auction. The visual style should be clean and minimal, using a horizontal line to represent the timeline and markers for each milestone. The slide should have a title, 'Origins & Timeline,' and use a neutral color palette. The target audience is potential investors and partners, aiming to demonstrate the brand's strong trajectory and potential for future growth.
Create a slide about how the Labubu IP grew from indie art to a global phenomenon, focusing on its key success factors like design, community, scarcity, and collaborations. The slide should have a visual representation of these factors, possibly using a circular diagram or animation. The overall tone should be analytical and insightful, highlighting the strategic elements behind Labubu's growth. Include speaker notes that elaborate on each factor and their combined impact on building a lasting IP.
This slide compares how Perplexity and ChatGPT handle live information and source citations in their responses. It explains that Perplexity defaults to live web queries for many prompts, while ChatGPT's browsing capability depends on the user's plan and mode. When browsing is off, ChatGPT relies on its internal knowledge base. The slide emphasizes the importance of traceability, urging users to prefer answers with clickable citations and visible domains. It also suggests verifying information by checking timestamps and following source links. The overall goal is to guide users in critically evaluating the information provided by these AI tools, highlighting the importance of live access, proper citations, and source verification for reliable information retrieval.
Create a title slide for a presentation comparing ChatGPT and Perplexity. The presentation will cover the user experience, the quality of answers, and the best use cases for each tool. It's not a benchmark, but rather a designer-friendly comparison to set the stage for a deeper dive into the topic. The presentation should have a clean, minimal aesthetic. The title should be "ChatGPT vs Perplexity" with a subtitle: "A Minimal Comparative Look — UX, Answers, and Use Cases". Speaker notes should include: Welcome, brief overview of the comparison (UX, answers, use cases, not a benchmark), and a mention of the focus on design aspects and subtle differences. The style should be clean and minimal.
Want to generate your own slides with AI?
Start creating high-tech, AI-powered presentations with Slidebook.
