AI Case Studies: Measuring Impact in Code Assist, Document QA, and Creative Generation
Description provided by the user:
Create a business presentation slide titled 'Applications and Case Studies' that highlights the concrete impact of our AI initiatives across three key product areas. Use a three-column layout for 'Code Assist', 'Document QA', and 'Creative Gen'. For each column, include 3-4 bullet points with specific, quantifiable metrics and key features. For example, show percentage lifts, latency improvements, or accuracy gains. Also, include a simple, abstract visual mock-up for each application to provide context without being too detailed. The overall design should be clean, professional, and data-driven.
We’re focusing on concrete impact across three areas: Code Assist, Document QA, and Creative Generation.
First, Code Assist. In controlled A/B tests we saw an 18% lift in task success, and pilot teams cut time-to-PR by 23%. Guardrails block insecure APIs and secrets right in the editor.
Next, Document QA. It uses retrieval-augmented generation with explicit citations, so answers are traceable. P95 latency stays under 120 milliseconds, and accuracy improves by 12 percentage points versus our baseline reader.
Finally, Creative Generation. We provide controllable outputs via style prompts. In evaluations, we hit over 95% prompt adherence, and we enforce safety filters with provenance via C2PA to track origin.
Together, these case studies show measurable gains and safe-by-design behavior, not just demos.
Behind the Scenes
How AI generated this slide
The AI first establishes a clear information hierarchy with a main title 'Applications and Case Studies' and a subtitle that sets the theme: 'Concrete impact across three product areas'.
A three-column grid layout is chosen as the optimal structure to present three distinct case studies, allowing for easy comparison and balanced visual weight across the slide.
For each column, the AI populates the content with a specific title (e.g., 'Code Assist'), and crafts bullet points that blend descriptive features ('RAG with transparent source citations') with hard, quantifiable data ('+18%', '<120 ms P95').
To visually emphasize the key performance indicators (KPIs), a dedicated 'MetricBadge' component is designed, using color and animation to draw the audience's attention to the most important data points.
Three distinct mock-up components ('EditorMock', 'ChatMock', 'ImageEditorMock') are created to visually represent each application's user interface in a simplified, schematic way, providing context without distracting from the core message.
Subtle animations are implemented using Framer Motion on the columns and badges to create a dynamic and engaging entrance effect, guiding the viewer's focus sequentially through the information.
Why this slide works
This slide is highly effective because it masterfully balances high-level strategy with granular, data-driven evidence. The three-column structure provides a clear, digestible framework for comparing the impact of AI across different domains. The use of specific, quantified metrics in eye-catching badges (e.g., '+18% task success', '+12 pp accuracy') transforms abstract benefits into tangible business outcomes, building credibility and making a compelling case for the technology's value. The inclusion of simplified UI mock-ups offers just enough visual context for each application without cluttering the slide. This blend of structured information, data visualization, and clean design makes the content persuasive and easy to understand for both technical and business audiences.
Slide Code
You need to be logged in to view the slide code.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is RAG and why is it important for the Document QA application?
RAG stands for Retrieval-Augmented Generation. It is an AI technique that enhances the accuracy and reliability of large language models (LLMs) by connecting them to external knowledge sources. In the context of Document QA, instead of the model generating an answer from its internal memory alone, it first retrieves relevant passages from a specific set of documents and then uses that information to formulate the answer. The slide's mention of 'transparent source citations' is a direct benefit of RAG, as it allows users to see exactly where the information came from, which builds trust, reduces hallucinations (incorrect information), and makes the system highly valuable for enterprise use cases.
What does 'C2PA provenance' signify for the Creative Gen tool?
C2PA, or the Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity, is a standard for providing context and history for digital media. Including 'C2PA provenance' means that any image or content generated by the tool is embedded with secure, tamper-evident metadata that certifies its origin and any subsequent modifications. This is a critical feature for responsible AI, as it helps combat misinformation and deepfakes by providing a verifiable trail. For users, it ensures authenticity and transparency, which is crucial for building trust in AI-generated creative content.
How do the metrics for 'Code Assist' demonstrate tangible business value?
The metrics shown for 'Code Assist' directly translate to significant improvements in developer productivity and software security, which are key business drivers. A '+18% task success lift' indicates that developers are more efficient and effective, reducing development time and costs. A '-23% time-to-PR reduction' directly accelerates the software development lifecycle, allowing for faster feature delivery and a quicker time-to-market. Finally, the 'Guardrails' feature that blocks insecure APIs is a proactive security measure that prevents costly vulnerabilities from entering the codebase, reducing risk and future remediation expenses.
Create a title slide for a tech presentation comparing two popular JavaScript frameworks, Remix and Next.js. The tone should be professional, modern, and forward-looking, hence the '2025' in the title. The slide needs to establish a theme of a pragmatic, technical deep-dive. It should feature a dark, tech-inspired background with subtle animations to engage the audience. The main title is 'Remix vs Next.js — 2025', with a subtitle 'A pragmatic, technical comparison.' Also include speaker details: 'Maya Patel · @mayacodes · Oct 12, 2025'.
Create a presentation slide that outlines a technology or product roadmap. The slide should be titled 'Roadmap and Q&A'. It needs to be split into three sections: 'Near-term', 'Mid-term', and 'Long-term', each with a few key bullet points. For the near-term, include tool-use reliability, better evals, and small specialized models. For the mid-term, add on-device/federated learning and energy efficiency. For the long-term, list reasoning, memory, and lifelong learning. The slide should also feature a prominent QR code for attendees to scan for slides and resources, along with a concluding message to open the floor for questions.
The user requested a slide for a business presentation aimed at stakeholders concerned with AI adoption. The goal was to demonstrate a robust and structured approach to managing the inherent risks of implementing large language models (LLMs) and other AI systems. The slide needed to be clear, professional, and reassuring. It should map specific, well-known AI risks (like hallucination and data leakage) to tangible technical solutions and controls, while also linking these efforts to established compliance frameworks like SOC 2 and GDPR to build trust with a corporate audience.
The user requested a technical presentation slide that clearly compares and contrasts the architectures of multimodal AI systems across three key domains: vision, audio, and video. The slide needed to visually break down the typical processing pipeline for each modality, from initial encoding to final reasoning with a Large Language Model (LLM). It was also important to showcase practical applications or tasks associated with each type of model, such as OCR for vision, ASR for audio, and step extraction for video. The design should be clean, organized, and easy to follow for an audience with some technical background in AI.
The user requested a slide detailing a company's comprehensive AI model validation process. The slide needed to be split into two main sections: performance evaluation and safety/red teaming. The evaluation part was to include standard benchmarks like MMLU and MT-Bench, task-specific tests, calibration, and regression testing. The safety section required coverage of adversarial prompts, jailbreaks, prompt injection, and metrics like refusal/hallucination rates. A key requirement was to also include a smaller element on 'run hygiene' to emphasize reproducibility, using seeds, and versioning, visually communicating a robust and trustworthy process.
Create a slide for a technical audience about optimizing large AI models. The slide should cover key strategies for reducing cost and computational footprint without sacrificing quality. I want to see a list of techniques, including Chinchilla scaling, LoRA/QLoRA, pruning, and infrastructure tactics like using spot instances. Please include two charts to visualize the impact: a line chart showing how training loss decreases with more tokens (like in the Chinchilla paper) and a bar chart quantifying the cost savings from common inference optimizations like quantization and batching.
Want to generate your own slides with AI?
Start creating high-tech, AI-powered presentations with Slidebook.
