LogotypeSlidebook
Alex Delaney

Alex Delaney

Generating with AI

A slide titled 'Multimodality: Vision, Audio, and Video' comparing three AI architectures in three columns. Each column represents a modality (Vision, Audio, Video), is color-coded, and shows a thumbnail, a process flow, and a list of example tasks.
A slide titled 'Multimodality: Vision, Audio, and Video' comparing three AI architectures in three columns. Each column represents a modality (Vision, Audio, Video), is color-coded, and shows a thumbnail, a process flow, and a list of example tasks. Fragment #1A slide titled 'Multimodality: Vision, Audio, and Video' comparing three AI architectures in three columns. Each column represents a modality (Vision, Audio, Video), is color-coded, and shows a thumbnail, a process flow, and a list of example tasks. Fragment #2A slide titled 'Multimodality: Vision, Audio, and Video' comparing three AI architectures in three columns. Each column represents a modality (Vision, Audio, Video), is color-coded, and shows a thumbnail, a process flow, and a list of example tasks. Fragment #3
This slide was generated for the topic:

An Overview of Multimodal AI Architectures for Vision, Audio, and Video Processing and Their Applications

Description provided by the user:

The user requested a technical presentation slide that clearly compares and contrasts the architectures of multimodal AI systems across three key domains: vision, audio, and video. The slide needed to visually break down the typical processing pipeline for each modality, from initial encoding to final reasoning with a Large Language Model (LLM). It was also important to showcase practical applications or tasks associated with each type of model, such as OCR for vision, ASR for audio, and step extraction for video. The design should be clean, organized, and easy to follow for an audience with some technical background in AI.

Categories

Technology & SoftwareData & VisualizationPresentations & Storytelling

Generated Notes

Open by framing the slide: three parallel pipelines for vision, audio, and video. We’ll reveal them left-to-right and briefly connect model blocks to real tasks. First, Vision (VLM). Explain the diagram: a vision encoder like ViT or CLIP turns pixels into embeddings. A projector aligns these with the LLM’s token space. The LLM handles reasoning and generation. Point to tasks: OCR, chart question answering, and general VQA. Call out the example thumbnail with bars and detection boxes to hint at OCR and chart parsing. Second, Audio. Describe the front end: waveform to mel spectrogram. An audio encoder produces representations that feed a text decoder or LLM. Emphasize the bi-directional nature: ASR and TTS, plus audio captioning. Third, Video. Note the temporal dimension: either sample frames or build spatiotemporal tokens. A projector adapts these to the LLM. Tasks include step extraction from instructional videos and grounding actions in time. Close by connecting the patterns: modality-specific encoders produce aligned tokens, a small projector bridges to a general LLM, and the LLM performs reasoning. Encourage questions on choices like frame rate, spectrogram parameters, and projector design.

Behind the Scenes

How AI generated this slide

  1. Deconstruct the request into three parallel tracks for Vision, Audio, and Video, establishing a three-column grid layout as the core structure.
  2. For each modality, define the standard architectural pipeline: a specialized encoder (ViT, Audio Encoder), a projector for modality alignment, and a large language model (LLM) for reasoning. This forms the 'Flow' component.
  3. Identify and list key tasks for each domain to demonstrate practical applications. These are rendered as 'chips' for easy readability, covering concepts like VQA, ASR, TTS, and video grounding.
  4. Create abstract, minimalist thumbnail graphics for each modality (a bar chart for vision, a sound wave for audio, and filmstrips for video) to provide quick visual context without complex imagery.
  5. Develop a reusable 'Panel' React component to ensure consistency across the three columns, using props for color, title, flow, and tasks. Color-coding (indigo, teal, amber) is used to visually differentiate the modalities.
  6. Implement subtle entry animations using Framer Motion for each panel to guide the viewer's focus sequentially, enhancing the presentation's narrative flow.
  7. Compose speaker notes that walk through each panel, explaining the technical components and connecting them to real-world tasks, preparing the user for a comprehensive presentation.

Why this slide works

This slide excels because it effectively translates complex multimodal AI architectures into a clear, comparative, and digestible format. The parallel three-column structure makes it easy for the audience to compare the pipelines for Vision Language Models (VLMs), Audio, and Video models side-by-side. Key concepts like 'Encoder,' 'Projector,' and 'LLM' are visually represented as a simple flow, demystifying the process. Using distinct color palettes and abstract thumbnails for each modality enhances visual separation and recall. The inclusion of task-specific 'chips' (e.g., 'OCR', 'ASR') grounds the abstract architectures in concrete applications. This design is highly effective for educational content, technical deep-dives, and strategy presentations on AI, making it highly discoverable for keywords like 'multimodal AI pipeline,' 'vision language model architecture,' 'audio processing with LLMs,' and 'spatiotemporal data analysis.'

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the role of the 'Projector' in these multimodal architectures?

The 'Projector' is a crucial but relatively small neural network component that acts as a bridge between the modality-specific encoder and the Large Language Model (LLM). The vision or audio encoder outputs embeddings in a high-dimensional space unique to its modality. The LLM, however, operates in a different embedding space designed for text tokens. The Projector's job is to translate or 'project' the embeddings from the encoder's space into the LLM's space, so the LLM can understand and reason about the visual or audio information as if it were text.

How do these models handle the temporal dimension in audio and video?

Audio and video models inherently deal with data that unfolds over time. For audio, the input waveform is converted into a Mel Spectrogram, which is a 2D representation of frequency over time. The audio encoder then processes this sequence to capture temporal patterns. For video, models typically either sample individual frames and process them as a sequence of images or use more complex methods to create 'spatiotemporal tokens' that capture both spatial information within a frame and motion across frames. This temporal understanding is critical for tasks like speech recognition (ASR) or action recognition in videos.

Why are different encoders used for different modalities?

Different data modalities have fundamentally different structures. Vision encoders like ViT (Vision Transformer) are designed to process pixel grids and identify spatial features and objects. Audio encoders are built to analyze frequency and time information from spectrograms to understand sounds, speech, and music. Video encoders must handle sequences of frames to capture motion and temporal changes. Using a specialized encoder for each modality is essential for efficiently and effectively extracting meaningful features before they are passed to the LLM for higher-level reasoning.

Related Slides

A presentation slide titled 'Roadmap and Q&A'. The left side details a roadmap with 'Near-term', 'Mid-term', and 'Long-term' goals. The right side displays a large, stylized QR code above text that reads 'Scan for slides, resources, and contact' and 'Thank you — happy to take your questions.'

A Technology Roadmap for Future Development and an Invitation for Q&A

A slide titled 'Risks, Security, and Governance' lists AI risks like 'Hallucination' and 'Prompt Injection' on the left and their corresponding mitigations like 'Verification & citations' and 'Sandboxed tools' on the right, connected by animated lines.

Mapping AI System Risks to Concrete Mitigation Strategies for Enterprise Governance and Security

A presentation slide titled 'Applications and Case Studies' showcasing three AI product areas: Code Assist, Document QA, and Creative Gen. Each area is in its own column with bullet points detailing features and performance metrics, accompanied by a simplified mock-up of the application's user interface.

AI Case Studies: Measuring Impact in Code Assist, Document QA, and Creative Generation

A slide divided into two main panels. The left panel, themed in blue, is titled 'Evaluation' and lists benchmarks and tests. The right panel, themed in rose, is titled 'Red Teaming & Safety' and lists adversarial testing methods. A small overlay at the bottom details 'Run hygiene' with a checklist.

A Dual-Pronged Framework for Comprehensive AI Model Evaluation and Safety Assurance

A slide titled 'Efficiency, Cost, and Footprint' detailing AI model optimization. The left side lists techniques like Chinchilla scaling and LoRA. The right side features two charts: a line graph showing decreasing training loss with more tokens, and a bar chart quantifying cost savings from quantization and batching.

Strategies for Enhancing AI Model Efficiency and Reducing Operational Costs

A slide titled 'Inference & Serving at Scale' detailing LLM optimization techniques. The left side lists methods like decoding strategies and quantization. The right side features a table comparing these methods' impact on latency vs. quality with colored up/down arrows.

Strategies for Scaling Large Language Model Inference: Balancing Latency, Throughput, and Quality

Want to generate your own slides with AI?

Start creating high-tech, AI-powered presentations with Slidebook.

Try Slidebook for FreeEnter the beta